Facial Plastic Surgery Blog

April 1, 2009

The Facial Rejuvenation Revolution

The Facial Rejuvenation Revolution
Sam P. Most, M.D., F.A.C.S.
www.drmost.com

In the past few years we have seen a significant evolution in thinking about facial rejuvenation.  In this space I hope to shed some light on this, and what this means when you visit the doctor’s office.  In the past, facial aging has been thought of as primarily a battle lost to the effects of gravity.  We understand now, however, that the process of aging is a complex one, and involves more than simply sagging of the skin on the face.  Recent research has shown that the changes that occur are, to use an oft-used phrase, ‘more than skin deep’.
For example, we know that what we see in an aging face is partly due to changes in the skin at the microscopic level—changes in pigment cell and collagen fiber organization, as well as loss of elasticity (the ability of the skin to stretch and “bounce back”).  While in the past it was thought that fat should be removed from the face (especially in areas such as the upper and lower eyelids), we realize that one of the stigmata of facial aging is loss of facial fullness, partially due to fat loss or redistribution .  Finally, we are just starting to understand the interaction of the facial fat and muscle with the cartilage and bony skeleton, and what makes a young face look the way it does.  All of these have changed the way we (as facial plastic surgeons) approach our patients.

What can I do?

What can YOU do to reduce the effects of father time?  First, take care of yourself.  Eat a healthy, balanced diet.  Don’t smoke. Cleanse, moisturize and protect your skin.  Avoid the sun .  Even if you do all of the above, there are some things you will not be able to control.  You can’t go back in time and tell your twenty-something self to be more careful with your skin.  You cannot stop the biology of aging (despite what you may read on the internet).  No anti-aging cosmeceutical yet exists that can penetrate your skin and change the process of aging .  Even if you do all of the above, the time may come when you search for ways to rejuvenate your face.
“It’s not your mother’s facelift anymore”
As I alluded to above, the old way of thinking about facial rejuvenation was ‘tighter is better’.  Given what I discussed above, I’m sure you can appreciate that our approach to facial rejuvenation has likewise changed.  While in the past the primary approach for facial rejuvenation was surgery (a ‘facelift’); we now have many non-invasive techniques that can be used to restore a youthful appearance to the face.
Non-invasive facial tightening
Chemical peel, dermabrasion, and laser peels are tried-and-true methods for removing skin wrinkles.  You have probably heard of these procedures, or you may know someone who has undergone one of these.  While these techniques have been around for a while, most all of the new research has centered on improvement of the laser.  Specifically, the goal has been to reduce the ‘downtime’ associated with it maintaining its benefits.  The latest technology involves treating only a fraction of the skin with the laser, thereby stimulating rejuvenation with less downtime (this is called a ‘fractionated laser’; some brands include Pixel and Fraxel).
You may have also heard of techniques that promise ‘nonsurgical facelifts’.  One of the first such techniques was Thermage®, but many similar techniques have come along.  The premise of these technologies is to transfer energy (often in the form of heat) to the deep tissues of the face, thereby ‘tightening’ the tissues that have ‘loosened’ over time.  The results on this have been mixed.  Some studies have shown that about 1 in 3 patients will have a noticeable effect.  Unfortunately, we cannot tell who those patients will be.
Injectables
There are 2 main types of injectables.  Muscle ‘freezers’ and facial fillers.  Botulinum toxin type A (most commonly Botox®) is the most commonly used ‘muscle freezer’ and is one of the most common facial rejuvenation procedures in my practice in the San Francisco Bay Area (as it is nationwide).  It works by temporarily blocking the muscle from getting a nerve signal.  Since muscle movement causes some types of wrinkles, it is only effective in treating so-called ‘dynamic’ wrinkles.  Note that Botox® is FDA approved for use in the glabella (the area between the eyebrows), but is commonly used ‘off-label’ in other areas of the face.  It takes about a week to show its effects, and lasts typically 3-4 months.
The other main category of injectables are the fillers.  Classically, collagen was used to ‘plump’ the face, especially the lips.  Given what we now know about loss of volume throughout the face, our use of fillers has expanded to include virtually all areas of the face.  Our repertoire of materials has also expanded far beyond collagen.  The hyaluronic acid (a naturally occurring substance) derivatives include Restylane®, Perlane®, and Juvederm®, to name a few.  Radiesse® is derived from a calcium base.  Other, more permanent fillers, include Artecoll®.  The ultimate injectable is your own tissue, namely, your own fat.  In this procedure, called fat transfer, we move small droplets of fat from an undesirable place to areas of the face that need more volume.
What about surgery?
The non-invasive procedures can only do so much.  When you and your surgeon feel the time is right, surgery may the best choice to give a natural, more long-lasting result.  As you can see, there are a number of options available prior to taking the plunge into a surgical procedure.  Surgery of the face to reverse aging includes brow rejuvenation (endoscopic browlift), eyelid lifts (blepharoplasty), and lower face/neck lifts (rhytidectomy).  These procedures can be done alone or in combination.  Each of these has undergone its own evolution, the discussion of which is beyond the scope of this summary.  Suffice to say that the trend is towards more conservative and natural-looking results.
OK, I want to take that first step…

Do your research.  Find someone who has experience and limits their practice to the face.  Importantly, this person should be familiar with the full range of facial treatments (surgical and nonsurgical).  Finally, it is important to find someone you trust will give you an honest assessment.  The goal of facial rejuvenation in 2009 is just that—rejuvenation.  This implies a natural restoration of facial youthfulness.  Our goal as facial plastic surgeons is to achieve this as safely and effectively as we can, with as minimally invasive a procedure as possible.

September 28, 2007

Anti-wrinkle cream study

Filed under: Botox, Facelift, Fillers, Minimally Invasive — drmost @ 3:48 pm

Dr. Most has published his most recent research on the effectiveness of over-the-counter anti-wrinkle creams.

Visit:

http://archfaci.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/9/5/340

April 26, 2007

Facial Plastic Surgery Videos-The Latest Technology Discussed

Filed under: Blepharoplasty, Botox, Browlift, Facelift, Fillers, Lasers, Minimally Invasive, Peels — drmost @ 9:19 am

Facial Plastic Surgery Videos

To learn more about Facial Plastic Surgery techniques, from the minimally invasive technologies (such as Fraxel, Pixel, and Thermage) to the latest twists to more traditional surgical techniques, look for online lectures on these topics.

We have posted several videos on topics such as these online, and these can be found on YouTube or at http://www.drmost.com/video_main.html

Furthermore, you can view Dr. Most’s most recent lecture on the Research Channel.
To check on airtimes, or to watch this video online now, click here.

Seminars in Facial Plastic Surgery (Fraxel, Pixel, Thermage, Botox, Facelifts and more!)

Filed under: Blepharoplasty, Botox, Browlift, Facelift, Fillers, Lasers, Minimally Invasive, Peels — drmost @ 9:06 am

Seminars in Facial Plastic Surgery (Fraxel, Pixel, Thermage, Facelift and Botox discussed!)

Dr. Most will be hosting his next Seminar on the latest Advances in Facial Plastic Surgery on Wednesday evening November 19th, at 801 Welch Road, Stanford, CA.

Topics to be discussed:
-Lasers peels and types (CO2, Pixel, etc)
-Chemical peels and types
-Botox®
-Restylane® and other hyaluronic acid-based fillers
-Radiesse®
-Facelifts, minilifts
-Eyelid Surgery

-Plus more!

Refreshments will be provided.

Please RSVP to info@drmost.com or call 650 736 FACE (3223) to reserve a seat!

Our seminars have been very popular and informative in the past, we hope you join us!
For directions or maps, please visit www.drmost.com

December 11, 2006

Lunchtime facelifts and Minilift procedures

Filed under: Botox, Facelift, Fillers, Minimally Invasive — drmost @ 3:54 pm

Lunch-hour facelifts or Minilifts that fit your lifestyle

One of the most pressing concerns regarding facelift procedures is the downtime associated with them. This is the time for any bruising or swelling to go away, or the time it takes to get back to work or play without being noticeable. For a standard deep-plane facelift, this can be 2 or 3 weeks. Minilifts promise zero (which is unlikely) to a few days ‘downtime’. It should be noted that by downtime, we don’t necessarily mean ‘recovery time’, which is the time that it takes for you to feel good enough to be up and about. This is generally much quicker, about 2 or 3 days or so after a deep-plane facelift.

However, for some people, even this would be too much bruising. To fit the active San Francisco Bay Area patient’s lifestyle, the minilift facelift, which comes in many different flavors, has come along. You may hear about S-lifts, MACS-lifts, ‘Might-mini lifts’, etc. These are all variations of a minilift procedure. The idea here is that we try to use a slightly smaller incision around the ear, and less of the tissues of the face are actually operated on. We try to minimize this because it reduces the amount of bruising. Of course, it always compromises the result (no matter what anyone says, this is the case, and it makes sense). Not that a compromise is necessarily bad. One just must be aware that the result (a) might not be as dramatic or (b) last as long as a traditional lifting procedure. As long as these are understood, the procedure can be a good one.

Some have begun advertising the ‘lunchtime lift’. This, again, means different things to different people. I have seen it mostly promoted by dermatologists who have experience in skin surgery, who are venturing into the facelifting arena. Alternatively, I have seen it used to describe non-invasive procedures such as Botox®, fillers such as Restylane® or Radiesse®, or Thermage® and Titan®. The bottom line is, whatever it is called, it is likely not anything new but a perhaps a variation on minilifting (though I can’t imagine this being done at lunchtime) or the above non-invasive procedures.

I am fortunate that I can discuss and offer all of these types of procedures, from the least invasive to the traditional ones, to my patients. I think it is important that the physician discussing your options with you is well-versed in all of these options (not just some), or it may lead to bias. For me, it is important that my patients be satisfied with their results for years, not just for months. Thus I make sure we both are on the same page regarding the positives and negatives of each procedure that’s out there.

So to summarize:
-Minilifts come in many flavors & names, may fit your lifestyle and budget
-Offer less bruising/swelling, quicker return to normal state
-Can be done under local anesthesia
-Cost less than traditional facelifts
-Are a good option if you don’t mind a lesser result

If you have questions comments about Minilifts, or your own experience with a Minilift or Lunchtime Lift, please post here.

October 5, 2006

Minimally Invasive Facial Plastic Surgery

Filed under: Blepharoplasty, Browlift, Facelift, Fillers, Minimally Invasive — drmost @ 5:05 pm

Each fall the American Academy of Facial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery meets. Here, leaders and students in the field of facial plastic surgery meet to discuss the latest advances in the field. For me, it is an opportunity to visit with my colleagues from around the country and learn what they’re up to.

One common theme the past few years has been an increasing emphasis on non-invasive procedures. Several techniques have now been around for a number of years, and we can start to see which ones work and which ones don’t. Below are a few of my observations, which are, of course, simply my opinion and should not be construed as medical advice.

Injectable fillers
These continue to be quite popular. Several new fillers are likely to be FDA-approved in the next few years, and will likely add to our arsenal of materials to use to treat wrinkles or depressions that occur due to aging.
Hyaluronic Acid Derivatives (e.g., Restylane®, Perlane®, others)
These remain popular and are well-tolerated. Hopefully, longer-lasting formulations will be coming.
Hydroxyapetite Gel (e.g., Radiesse®)
Also a good choice for the face, but probably not for the lips, as there have been some problems with injections in that area. I have been using this to revise other folks’ rhinoplasties with good success (see www.sfrhinoplasty.com)
Sculptra
Not really a filler, as it induces your body to make collagen and ‘fill’ itself in. This product was initially greeted with great fanfare. The consensus seems to be that it certainly is effective, but may not be for everyone. Repeat injections are necessary to get the effect, and it is rather expensive.
Collagen-may be making a comeback in the next few years, stay tuned!

Threat lifts
Thread lifts made a big splash last year. These were hailed as the end of the modern facelift procedure. Featured on Oprah, huge publicity followed. We now know that the technique certainly is intriguing and may have its place in certain situations. For example, it may be used for isolated, shorter-term treatment of the aging face in younger (40-ish) patients, or at the same time as a mini-facelift. However, it is definitely not a replacement for the traditional facelift, which remains the most reliable and best procedure for treatment of the aged face and neck. AND I’m glad to say the manufacturers of the technology agree with the surgeons on this point! I think the technology is exciting and as surgeons we can look to use this as an additional tool to treat the aging face…..
MORE ON THE LATEST IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUES TO FOLLOW!

For more information on the lateset in minimally invasive facial rejuvenation, visit www.drmost.com

Powered by WordPress